Precise Language and Political Language

Kurt at Cultural Offering comments on a piece on the Economist’s Lexington blog.

The article contrasts the use of language by Democrats and Republicans in the US, despairing of politics’ general blurring and abuse of language and reflecting on recent research that the Democrats have a tendency to use loose, imprecise language whereas Republicans are more successful with simpler, more concrete terms.

I’ve just recently finished Frank Luntz’s Words That Work.  Luntz has spent many years working in US politics (particularly with the Republicans).  He specialises in market-testing words and phrases to develop a lexicon of “words that work” for a particular context.  Fascinating insight into the effective use of language and the scientist in me loves it.

Another side of me sees individual words exploited relentlessly until they become as meaningless as an exhausted gold mine.  I suspect that once, long long ago “mission statement” actually had a meaning.  I fear now for “innovation” and “casual elegance”.

Advertisements

About Andrew Munro

An independent business consultant, interim manager and writer, Andrew operates through his company, Burning Pine Ltd (http://burningpine.com).
This entry was posted in Writing and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s